AsynchronousSocketChannel still throws unspecified exception

[Alan Bateman]

cowwoc wrote:
> :
> I've provided you
> with many concrete reasons why treating timeout <= 0 as "return immediately"
> is the right way to go
Yes, and this is useful as it's attempting to use the API in a different 
way that it was envisaged.

> :
>
> PS: You don't need to actually *implement* timeout <= 0 as returning
> available bytes. All you need to do is put it in the specification and
> return 0 for now (as if there are no available bytes). We can improve the
> implementation later on. I'm mostly worried about the specification here.
>   
We can't change this for jdk7 but we what we can do is decide the right 
solution for jdk8.

-Alan.