Fwd: Re: Suppress creation of SocksSocketImpl in SocketAdaptor's constructor

[Alan Bateman]

On 25/11/2011 11:38, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> For clarity, the changes I intend to push for this are as follows:
Looks fine to me, thanks for taking it. I probably would make it 
"Should" rather than "should" just to be consistent with the other 
internal errors in this area but it's not a big deal as it should never 
happen.

-Alan.