Give default value of O_NOFOLLOW if it is not defined

[Alan Bateman]

On 13/01/2012 05:34, Charles Lee wrote:
>
> I am thinking NOFOLLOW_LINKS is not O_NOFOLLOW again and again....
> On the platform, which does not support O_NOFOLLOW, there will be 
> occurred that some api supports NOFOLLOW_LINKS, others are not. This 
> will be a little confusing.
Right, LinkOption.NOFOLLOW_LINKS does not imply O_NOFOLLOW is needed. 
For example the following:

Files.readAttributes(file, NOFOLLOW_LINKS) or
Files.copy(source, target, NOFOLLOW_LINKS)

don't require using the O_NOFOLLOW flag.

> :
>
> Please check: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~littlee/7129029/webrev.01/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Elittlee/7129029/webrev.01/>
>
I'm happy with this I have pushed it on your behalf:  
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/7e593aa6ad41

-Alan.