Code Review Request For 7185340

Dan Xu dan.xu at oracle.com
Mon Jul 30 14:22:41 PDT 2012


On 07/29/2012 11:17 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On 30/07/2012 2:20 PM, Dan Xu wrote:
>> Thank you, Alan. I see the change is already pushed into the repository.
>> I am going to move the bug status to 10-Fix Delivered. But I don't know
>> what values I need put into "Commit To Fix In Build", "Fixed In Build",
>> and "Integrated In Build". In glisten, I see the latest build under
>> /java/re/jdk/8/promoted/all is b49. Shall I put b49 to those fields?
>
> While Alan is likely sleeping ... :)
>
> Change the bug to "Fix Available". It is marked "Fix Delivered" after 
> the TL repository integrates. b49 is already promoted and I would not 
> expect TL to integrate again before the next promotion (b50), so b51 
> is a reasonable guesstimate for both "commit to fix in build" and 
> "fixed in build". RE will fill in "Integrated in build" when the bug 
> is moved to Fix Delivered after integration. It is "Integrated in 
> build" that is the important value for tracking purposes.
>
> Cheers,
> David Holmes
>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> - Dan
Thank you, David. I have moved the bug to 8-Fix Available.

- Dan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nio-dev/attachments/20120730/a9b892f8/attachment.html 


More information about the nio-dev mailing list