RFR for JDK-8022879 TEST_BUG: sun/nio/cs/MalformedSurrogates.java fails intermittently

Eric Wang yiming.wang at oracle.com
Thu Dec 12 04:51:08 PST 2013


Hi Martin & All,

Please review the changes for MalformedSurrogates.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ewang/JDK-8022879/webrev.00/ 
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eewang/JDK-8022879/webrev.00/>

The logic of changes are
1. Iterate all charsets of system to check whether the charset supports 
encode.
2. If yes, check whether it supports surrogate.
3. If yes, check whether it rejects malformed surrogate and can 
en(de)code normal surrogate.

Thanks,
Eric
On 2013/11/8 0:23, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> I still like my old idea of iterating over all charsets and checking 
> their reasonableness properties.
>
> Probably all charsets bundled with the jdk should reject unpaired 
> surrogates when encoding.  Check it!  Failure to do so might be 
> considered a security bug.
>
> I would use CodingErrorAction.REPORT  instead of REPLACE and examine 
> that the resulting exception occurs and has reasonable detail.
>
> For properly paired surrogates, check that the charset can encode the 
> resulting codepoint using canEncode, and if so, check that encoding 
> succeeds.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Eric Wang <yiming.wang at oracle.com 
> <mailto:yiming.wang at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>      Hi Everyone
>
>     I am working on bug https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8022879.
>     The test sun/nio/cs/MalformedSurrogates.java
>     <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/file/44fa6bf42846/test/sun/nio/cs/MalformedSurrogates.java>
>     doesn't run if the system default encoding is UTF-8. But
>     unfortunately, UTF-8 is the default charset of most test machines,
>     it means the test get few chances to be executed.
>     Another defect is the test would failed if the default charset is
>     UTF-16 or UTF-32 as the test doesn't take the 2 charsets into
>     consideration.
>
>     The idea of fix  is no matter what system charset it is, the test
>     should always be executed. Here thanks Martin's suggestion that
>     instead of checking byte size, we can use
>     CharsetEncoder.canEncode() and
>     CharsetEncoder.onMalformedInput(CodingErrorAction.REPLACE) to
>     check and replace malformed chars.
>
>     So the test can be re-designed as below:
>
>     1. To use CharsetEncoder.canEncode() to check whether the string
>     includes malformed characters.
>     2. If a string includes malformed characters e.g.
>     "abc\uD800\uDB00efgh", then set
>     CharsetEncoder.onMalformedInput(CodingErrorAction.REPLACE) to
>     replace the malformed characters to the replacement "?" when
>     calling CharsetEncoder.encode() method.
>     3. Verified by decoding the encoded ByteBuffer to CharBuffer,
>     check whether it includes replacement "?" and compare it with old
>     string, if not equal, then test passed.
>     4. If a sting doesn't include malformed characters e.g.
>     "abc\uD800\uDC00efgh", the CharsetEncoder.encode() converts it to
>     ByteBuffer which doesn't include replacement "?"
>     5. Verified by decoding the encoded ByteBuffer to CharBuffer,
>     confirm that it doesn't include replacment "?" and compare it with
>     old string, if equal, then test passed.
>
>     Please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Eric
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nio-dev/attachments/20131212/88e17dd7/attachment.html 


More information about the nio-dev mailing list