A race problem about select in a small time window
Sean Chou
zhouyx at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Mar 13 20:17:24 PDT 2013
I didn't find failures in my test suite, so it's ok to go!
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com>wrote:
> On 12/03/2013 09:58, Sean Chou wrote:
>
>> The code looks fine, I tried with the test case in first mail and it
>> passed.
>> I'll try to run more testcases which need one or two days.
>> It's a sudden you removed the Updator layer.
>>
> Thanks, in the mean-time we can do the review here.
>
> As regards removing Updator then this is part of the problem as it's too
> fragile to map to opcodes when queuing the change. Also it doesn't take
> account of the possibility of that interestOps might queue a change at just
> around the time that the channel is being removed. The new implementation
> also avoids needing to create an Updator for each change to the interest
> ops.
>
> -Alan
>
--
Best Regards,
Sean Chou
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nio-dev/attachments/20130314/c8b6df60/attachment.html
More information about the nio-dev
mailing list