Covariant overrides on the Buffer Hierachy
Ulf Zibis
Ulf.Zibis at CoSoCo.de
Sun Apr 20 21:44:24 UTC 2014
Hi again,
one additional reason on top of my list from yesterday why I would prefer the language change:
- Removing "final" is a performance decrease.
-Ulf
Am 20.04.2014 20:56, schrieb Richard Warburton:
> Hi,
>
> It looks to me like there are no obvious problems with changing the buffer
>> subclasses to use covariant overrides. As Alan mentioned, one API was
>> modified this way in 7, by Martin Buchholz. The discussion threads for this
>> change are [2] and [3]. It looks like Martin considered additional
>> covariant overrides, but ultimately backed off from this for a variety of
>> incidental reasons; see [4]. There is a certain amount of work here above
>> and beyond just changing the return types, but there don't appear to be any
>> fundamental issues.
>
> So I've put a patch on cr at
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rwarburton/buffer-overrides-0/. It also touches
> a couple of other classes which have unnecessary casts in. Aside from being
> a good idea, fixing the casts is also necessary due to -Werror. Let me
> know if I've missed anything or if there are any outstanding issues.
>
> I think the bugs that this resolves are:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4774077
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6451131
>
> regards,
>
> Richard Warburton
>
> http://insightfullogic.com
> @RichardWarburto <http://twitter.com/richardwarburto>
>
More information about the nio-dev
mailing list