Bundled zip FileSystemProvider fails to recognize "readonly"?

[Michael Hall]

On Apr 21, 2015, at 3:17 PM, Martin Buchholz <martinrb at google.com> wrote:

> It seems "obvious" that file system implementations should have options for read-only access, mirroring the readonly options from mount(8).
> 
> For existing zip files, one almost always wants to open them read-only.  New zip files are almost always rewritten from scratch.

But you’re not talking about a static zip file you are talking about a zip FileSystem. What’s the point of using FileSystem if there is nothing dynamic going on?

Michael Hall





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nio-dev/attachments/20150421/a067584b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5262 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nio-dev/attachments/20150421/a067584b/smime-0001.p7s>