RFR: 8174039: (ch) DefaultAsynchronousChannelProvider should be split into platform specific versions

[Alan Bateman]

On 07/02/2017 11:54, Langer, Christoph wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> as discussed yesterday in 
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nio-dev/2017-February/004107.html, 
> there is another potential for improvement like 
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173982.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8174039 
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8174039>
>
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8174039.0/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eclanger/webrevs/8174039.0/>
>
> I also made a little cleanup in DefaultSelectorProvider.java.
>
> The webrev is based on JDK9. Please let me know if this could still go 
> there or if I should do it in JDK10. I think the change is rather 
> explicit and clear – so maybe there’s a chance for 9, still?
>
>
This looks okay to me.

At this point in the release when P4 and P5 issues are meant to be 
deferred. So it seems like something for JDK 10 to me. The reason that 
the FileSystemProvider change was important for JDK 9 is because it's 
related to a small regression in startup performance.

-Alan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nio-dev/attachments/20170207/3d765754/attachment.html>