8199791: (se) More Selector cleanup

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Tue Mar 20 14:53:29 UTC 2018


On 20/03/2018 14:44, David Lloyd wrote:
> Looks good to me (non-reviewer).  I still believe the timeout calcs
> should use System.nanoTime() instead of currentTimeMillis(), and I'd
> like to see Linux using eventfd instead of a pipe for selector
> wakeups... but those are subjects for future discussion/patches,
> probably.
You're probably right that this should move to nanoTime. On eventfs, 
what advantage do you see for using this over the socketpair?

-Alan


More information about the nio-dev mailing list