adding rsockets support into JDK

[Lu, Yingqi]

Thank you for your feedback, Alan!

I will modify accordingly, update the JEP online and send a copy to jdk-dev for broader review.

Thanks,
Lucy

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alan Bateman [mailto:Alan.Bateman at oracle.com]
>Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 7:20 AM
>To: Lu, Yingqi <yingqi.lu at intel.com>
>Cc: nio-dev at openjdk.java.net; Viswanathan, Sandhya
><sandhya.viswanathan at intel.com>; Aundhe, Shirish
><shirish.aundhe at intel.com>; Kaczmarek, Eric <eric.kaczmarek at intel.com>
>Subject: Re: adding rsockets support into JDK
>
>On 16/05/2018 20:26, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have just submitted the initial JEP draft at
>https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8203314 and linked it to the bug
>JDK-8195160.
>>
>> Do I also need to submit a PDF version to jep-submit at openjdk.java.net or
>jdk-dev email list?
>>
>> Please review the JEP draft and let me know your comments and feedback.
>>
>I agree with Paul that it would be good to get "RDMA" into the title and
>summary.
>
>What would you think about dropping the "Non-public classes" sections and
>the class diagrams from the Description? That will reduce the Description
>significantly and make it easier for readers to see that the proposal is to
>expose the support as factory methods in jdk.net.Sockets.
>
>I think the Testing section should make it clear that test requires special
>hardware.
>
>The Alternative section looks good, just change "JDK1.7" to "JDK 7".
>
>Risks and Assumptions #3 - I think this can be expanded a bit to say that
>SocketChannels to RDMA sockets cannot be multiplexed with other selectable
>channels.
>
>-Alan.