RFR: 8229872: (fs) Increase buffer size used with getmntent
Brian Burkhalter
brian.burkhalter at oracle.com
Tue Aug 20 20:16:41 UTC 2019
Hello,
> On Aug 20, 2019, at 12:46 PM, Vladimir Kempik <vkempik at azul.com> wrote:
>
> about L236, I really think I should not
>
> linebuffer will live throughtout app lifetime and will be realloced only when needed. It’s kind of cache now, for use by getmntent_r.
> if I free linebuffer and set it to NULL, then I will have to set maxlinelen to 0 as well, otherwise getline will fail.
> This means the app will have to recalc maxline ( and do some reallocs to linebuffer) every time setmntent0 is called.
>
> So I believe it’s better to let linebuffer leave, it’s not memory leak as we are tracking it and using it still.
OK
>>> On Aug 20, 2019, at 12:31 PM, Vladimir Kempik <vkempik at azul.com <mailto:vkempik at azul.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> after reading manpage for getline I think I have found some elegant solution - to let getline manage size of buffer.
>>>
>>> Please review v2 of patch here http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vkempik/8229872/webrev.02/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vkempik/8229872/webrev.02/>
>>>
>>> I’m still worried about syncing maxlinelen and linebuffer between Java_sun_nio_fs_LinuxNativeDispatcher_setmntent0 and Java_sun_nio_fs_LinuxNativeDispatcher_getmntent, if they are run from different threads.
Yes, I also wonder whether a synchronized(this) block or some such in LinuxFileSystem.getMountEntries(String) might be in order.
Thanks,
Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nio-dev/attachments/20190820/7f70ca0e/attachment.html>
More information about the nio-dev
mailing list