8220793: (fs) No support for changing modification time of symlink

Brian Burkhalter brian.burkhalter at oracle.com
Thu May 2 02:54:54 UTC 2019


> On May 1, 2019, at 12:50 PM, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks, the logic in setTimes looks right. As setting the time stamps on a sym link is a bit of outlier then I think I would put the useFutimes first but that is no big deal.

I changed it to put useFuTimes first.

> The new changes to UnixNativeDispatcher.c create an inconsistency that I'm trying to figure out. The init method is using dlym whereas the the Java_sun_nio_fs_UnixNativeDispatcher_lutimes0 references the function. If you are confident that lutimes is available on the all the gcc versions that are used to build the JDK then my_lutimes_func is not needed.

I cleaned this up; hopefully it is OK now.

All tiers passed aside from a single unrelated failed test.

Thanks,

Brian

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8220793/webrev.03/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/nio-dev/attachments/20190501/4ed36e3a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the nio-dev mailing list