RFR 8245194: Unix domain socket channel implementation

[Alan Bateman]

On 23/07/2020 09:57, Michael McMahon wrote:
>
> Hi Mark
>
>
> Thanks for reviewing the webrev.
>
>
> I think that might be an option for providing the function at a JDK 
> (non standard) level.
>
> But, I don't currently see a strong enough justification for it.
>
I think Mark's suggestion of a socket option would be a feasible 
alternative to adding a method to NetworkChannel. However, I agree, 
there doesn't seem to be a strong need for this at this time and it's 
better to keep it out of this JEP.

-Alan