RFR: 8324972: (bf) Make DirectByteBuffer.Deallocator idempotent [v4]

[Alan Bateman]

On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 09:48:15 GMT, Mark Sheppard <msheppar at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - Use existing UNSAFE static variable
>>  - Remove unused import
>
> Is the Deallocator abstraction designed to be thread safe as advocated in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8316337  ?
> Is it  correct and proper design, hence good practice, as per the original logic, that Deallocator guard against improper release of its encapsulated native memory more than once?

@msheppar Do you have any other information to add? I'm wondering if this issue should be closed as it seems to be passed on the assumption that the cleaning action runs more than once.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17647#issuecomment-1945561495