RFR: 8338411: Implement JEP 486: Permanently Disable the Security Manager [v2]
Harshitha Onkar
honkar at openjdk.org
Tue Oct 22 21:04:30 UTC 2024
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:29:38 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan <psadhukhan at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 97 commits:
>>
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/jep486' into JDK-8338411
>> - Change apiNote to deprecated annotation on checkAccess methods. Change method dedescription to "Does nothing".
>> - Sanitize the class descriptions of DelegationPermission and ServicePermission
>> by removing text that refers to granting permissions, but avoid changes that
>> affect the API specification, such as the description and format of input
>> parameters.
>> - Restored methods in RMIConnection to throw SecurityExceptions again but
>> with adjusted text that avoids the word "permission".
>> - Add text to class description of MBeanServer stating that implementations
>> may throw SecurityException if authorization doesn't allow access to resource.
>> - Restore text about needing permissions from the desktop environment in the
>> getPixelColor and createScreenCapture methods.
>> - Add api note to getClassContext to use StackWalker instead and
>> add DROP_METHOD_INFO option to StackWalker.
>> - Change checkAccess() methods to be no-ops, rather than throwing
>> SecurityException.
>> - Merge
>> - Merge
>> - ... and 87 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/f50bd0d9...f89d9d09
>
> test/jdk/javax/swing/UIDefaults/6795356/TableTest.java line 45:
>
>> 43: JTable table = new JTable();
>> 44: TableCellEditor de = table.getDefaultEditor(Double.class);
>> 45: if (de == null) {
>
> I guess we can test this without SM since it tests SwingLazyValue?
I believe I had removed this test because it wasn't testing anything significant. But I have re-added it please re-review and let me know if it holds value to be retained.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21498#discussion_r1811400040
More information about the nio-dev
mailing list