<!DOCTYPE html><html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 19/04/2024 22:46, Bruno Ploumhans
wrote:<span style="white-space: pre-wrap">
</span></div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:CAH225Xj_GoBMM0RT60jZ7EV_oXvsBnYgrnNX9k4V2v=QL6bkNg@mail.gmail.com">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
Would the same hold say for a file that is accessed via the network?
Maybe in those cases the file access is actually a network operation
in disguise.</pre>
</blockquote>
It might although the user of the API or the implementation may have
no knowledge that the file is "remote".<br>
<br>
<span style="white-space: pre-wrap">
</span>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:CAH225Xj_GoBMM0RT60jZ7EV_oXvsBnYgrnNX9k4V2v=QL6bkNg@mail.gmail.com">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">The discussion is focused on FileChannel as it is somewhat questionable whether it should have been an InterruptibleChannel in the first place.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
It sounds questionable, yes. Is this something that can be changed now?
</pre>
</blockquote>
The discussion that I linked to didn't go very far, it would need
energy to try to move it forward, more likely as an option when
opening a file.<br>
<br>
-Alan<br>
</body>
</html>