StageStyle and unified toolbars on the Mac
Kevin Rushforth
kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
Thu Feb 23 06:08:56 PST 2012
In that case, maybe a separate property would be better, rather than a
new StageStyle.
-- Kevin
Pavel Safrata wrote:
> Kevin, if I understand the request correctly, the goal is to have
> system default background, not transparent one and not white one.
> Pavel
>
> On 23.2.2012 14:47, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> But since there will always be a Scene, wouldn't the following suffice?
>>
>> scene.setFill(Color.TRANSPARENT);
>> stage.initStageStyle(StageStyle.DECORATED_TRANSPARENT);
>> stage.setScene(scene);
>>
>> -- Kevin
>>
>>
>> Stephen Winnall wrote:
>>> Hi Kevin
>>>
>>> Whereas DECORATED_TRANSPARENT is also a possible desirable
>>> StageStyle, it wouldn't solve my problem. I just need
>>> DECORATED_WITHOUT_ANYTHING_ELSE (what I call bare boards). I think
>>> the point is that the Stage should not provide any sort of
>>> background, just what the native windowing system provides. Any
>>> background is a task for the Scene. In my view, instead of
>>> StageStyle, Stage should have provided #decorated, #transparent and
>>> #utility as three independent properties.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> On 23 Feb 2012, at 14:04, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for filing this. I added the following comment to the JIRA:
>>>>
>>>> "One way to provide the desired capability would be to add
>>>> StageStyle.DECORATED_TRANSPARENT, perhaps with a shorter name."
>>>>
>>>> -- Kevin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Stephen Winnall wrote:
>>>>> Given the text of the StageStyle Javadoc:
>>>>>
>>>>> " DECORATED
>>>>> Defines a normal Stage style with a solid white background and
>>>>> platform decorations.
>>>>>
>>>>> TRANSPARENT
>>>>> Defines a Stage style with a transparent background and no
>>>>> decorations.
>>>>>
>>>>> UNDECORATED
>>>>> Defines a Stage style with a solid white background and no
>>>>> decorations.
>>>>>
>>>>> UTILITY
>>>>> Defines a Stage style with a solid white background and
>>>>> minimal platform decorations used for a utility window.
>>>>> ", I suspect the software is performing to spec., i.e. it's not a
>>>>> bug, strictly speaking :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> But I've submitted a feature report (I'm not that familiar with
>>>>> Jira and am new to JavaFX 2). You can see it at
>>>>>
>>>>> http://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-19834
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Steve
>>>>>
>>>>> On 22 Feb 2012, at 19:27, Richard Bair wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm, tried a transparent background but it didn't look like it
>>>>>> would work. You may want to file a bug on this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Richard
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 22, 2012, at 7:04 AM, Stephen Winnall wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm trying to create a unified toolbar on the Mac using JavaFX
>>>>>>> 2.1 b13. For those who don't know what that is, there's an
>>>>>>> example (albeit for Qt) at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://labs.qt.nokia.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/oldandunified.png
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (The bottom variant is the unified toolbar).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've managed this with Swing using Java 1.6. You do it by
>>>>>>> creating a JFrame with apple.awt.brushMetalLook set to TRUE and
>>>>>>> adding a transparent JToolBar at the top of the frame. It looks
>>>>>>> like this (after appropriate styling of the JToolBar and its
>>>>>>> buttons):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://yfrog.com/mrh1ydp
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can then add further content (e.g. in a JPanel with a white
>>>>>>> background) after the toolbar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can't see how to do this with JavaFX. In fact, I suspect it is
>>>>>>> impossible, because a Stage either has a solid white background
>>>>>>> or is completely transparent according to StageStyle. Is there
>>>>>>> any way of suppressing the sold white background? Why does a
>>>>>>> Stage have to have a white background at all? Shouldn't it just
>>>>>>> provide the boards (to stick with the theatre metaphor)? The
>>>>>>> white background belongs to the scene, surely?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Perhaps there's another way of making a unified toolbar?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>
>>>
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list