Affine transforms - matrix algebra

[Martin Desruisseaux]

Le 12/07/12 13:46, Pavel Safrata a écrit :
> Ok, thanks. We need to be consistent at least in scope our transforms, 
> so let's pick from
>
> 1) createConcatenatedTransform, createInvertedTransform
> 2) getConcatenatedTransform, getInvertedTransform
> 3) createConcatenatenation, createInverse
> 4) getConcatenation, getInverse
>
> I'd probably vote for #3. Any other votes/suggestions?

Both #1 and #3 look fine to me.

     Thanks,

         Martin