Patch: issue RT-14177

Tom Schindl tom.schindl at bestsolution.at
Fri Jun 1 07:44:24 PDT 2012


Hi Florian,

Good. I can you tell me why the super-type loop is used - I think it was
already in your first patch - wondering what this is good for.

Tom

Am 01.06.12 16:38, schrieb Florian Brunner:
> I tested rt-14177.3.patch and Tom is right, the ClassNotFoundException has to be catched otherwise the new code won't be executed.
> 
> Unfortunatly, hg import failed for 5.patch for some reason.
> 
> I created and tested a new patch (with "hg diff --git" as recommended by Kevin (see attachements, I don't have the necessary rights in JIRA).
> 
> It works fine for my use case.
> 
> I also renamed ex2 to ex3 and ex3 to ex2 and fixed some formatting issues.
> 
> Note however that now the method contains around 100 lines of code. You might want to refactor it into several smaller methods for maintainability reasons.
> 
> Regards,
> Florian
> 
> 
> Am Freitag 01 Juni 2012, 11:04:09 schrieb Tom Schindl:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've uploaded a fixed version of the patch! I think Richards patch
>> missed to catch the CNE for the context classloader.
>>
>> I can not comment on other areas of the control system - just did a
>> short Class.forName-scan and can confirm you are finding about
>> PopControl - it even has the same fix for RT-17525 so extracing the code
>> and moveing it to a library makes sense.
>>
>> CSS might have similar problems (but in case of classloading but they
>> are harder to fix because one has to infer the correct classloader from
>> the CSS-URI or even the target they are applied to!).
>>
>> FXML has fixed all iusses (beside one small remaining issue I'm just
>> discussing with Greg on this list) because it allows to pass custom
>> classloaders and hence stuff loaded through FXML will directly profit
>> from the Control enhancement.
>>
>> FXML is IMHO different to CSS/Controls because there's a defined
>> lifecycle and so controlling the classloader there is much easier than
>> it is in CSS/Control space where the classloader access is happening in
>> an async fashion.
>>
>> I currently have no local build so I have to rely on Florian to give
>> feedback if it fixes the problem. From a source introspection it looks
>> good to me with my patch 5.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> Am 01.06.12 05:22, schrieb Jonathan Giles:
>>> +1 on the patch, although I do wonder whether we are being consistent in
>>> the other places where classloading comes into play. Is this something
>>> that should be extracted and used as an internal library?
>>>
>>> For example, there is much the same code in PopupControl that needs to
>>> be fixed at the same time as the patch you are submitting here, but more
>>> abstractly, should we have a library rather than duplicate similar code
>>> in FXML and CSS as well?
>>>
>>> -- Jonathan
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/06/2012 3:14 p.m., Richard Bair wrote:
>>>> Florian / Tom,
>>>>
>>>> I've uploaded two patches to the issue:
>>>> rt-14177.2.patch
>>>> rt-14177.3.patch
>>>>
>>>> The .3 patch is my preferred one. Can you take a look / apply it and
>>>> see if it solves your issue? If the .3 patch works, then I think we've
>>>> got a clean patch which will produce no additional performance
>>>> overhead to a correctly functioning JavaFX application today, but will
>>>> fix your issue (at least as Tom said in the issue itself for 95% of
>>>> the folks).
>>>>
>>>> We can then file a new issue for the remaining 5% cases which will
>>>> need more time (since it involves some form of new API) whereas in
>>>> this case it should "just work".
>>>>
>>>> David / Jonathan, can you guys give a quick code review? I'm pretty
>>>> sure the code does what I want it to do, and hopefully Florian / Tom
>>>> will tell us if what I want it to do is actually the right thing to do
>>>> (ie: solves the issue) :-).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Richard
>>>>
>>>> On May 31, 2012, at 5:45 PM, Richard Bair wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Florian,
>>>>>
>>>>> We'll get this fixed ASAP.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Richard
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 31, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Florian,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This JIRA issue is targeted for 3.0 which is just in the initial
>>>>>> planning stages, so no one has looked at it yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The patch as attached to the issue deals with one case of CSS
>>>>>> loading a skin, but when the controls team evaluated it, their take
>>>>>> was that it a more general platform issue, although it could be
>>>>>> dealt with in isolation. In any case, even if I were to assign this
>>>>>> back to someone on the controls team, this code would need to be
>>>>>> evaluated for potential bugs and to ensure that there are no
>>>>>> security issues (probably not an issue, but since it would be using
>>>>>> a system class loader we need to make sure it is never called from a
>>>>>> privileged context), which is unlikely to happen for the current
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Kevin
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Florian Brunner wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Kevin,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is the status of my patch?
>>>>>>> As mentioned in JIRA, this issue is becoming a blocker! Please
>>>>>>> increase the priority! (Nobody from Oracle is responding on JIRA).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can we agree then to integrate the provided patch? It improves the
>>>>>>> situation but doesn't introduce any API additions and we can
>>>>>>> replace/ complete it later with other solutions if needed.
>>>>>>> Please tell me if I should change something in the patch to get it
>>>>>>> approved.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am Freitag 06 April 2012, 23:58:13 schrieb Kevin Rushforth:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I attached it to the JIRA issue.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- Kevin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Florian Brunner wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here the patch created with "hg diff --git" and zipped.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am Freitag 06 April 2012, 18:31:23 schrieb Kevin Rushforth:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Right. Since you didn't file the issue and are not the assignee,
>>>>>>>>>> you can't add an attachment.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Copying Brian Beck in case this is something we can (and want
>>>>>>>>>> to) fix.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In the mean time, you can e-mail me the patch and I'll attach it
>>>>>>>>>> to the bug report.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- Kevin
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Florian Brunner wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kevin,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your response.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Unfortunatly, I don't see a way to attach something to the JIRA
>>>>>>>>>>> issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Either I'm missing something or maybe I need additional rights?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am Donnerstag 05 April 2012, 18:54:38 schrieben Sie:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Great. Please attach the patch as a zip file to the JIRA issue
>>>>>>>>>>>> (preferably generated with either webrev or "hg diff --git")
>>>>>>>>>>>> so that it can be evaluated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Kevin
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Florian Brunner wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me introduce myself: my name is Florian Brunner and I'm a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Senior Software Engineer from Switzerland.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I started to use JavaFX in an OSGi environment. Now I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> stumbled over the following issue, which blocks me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-14177
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have written a patch now. It probably doesn't solve the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> whole issue, but at least it unblocks me for now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be great if you could integrate it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note that I contributed to OpenJDK before (Swing) and have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> signed the Sun Contributor Agreement:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html#b
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Florian Brunner - java.net - puce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>


-- 
B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t                        EDV Systemhaus GmbH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
tom schindl                 geschäftsführer/CEO
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eduard-bodem-gasse 5-7/1   A-6020 innsbruck     fax      ++43 512 935833
http://www.BestSolution.at                      phone    ++43 512 935834


More information about the openjfx-dev mailing list