Why does this list not have a reply-to?

[Randahl Fink Isaksen]

Yes - that is probably because of the List-... headers, but if a 
reply-to header was added to all outgoing mail from this list, the 
openjfx address would be the default reply to address when people hit reply.

I think that would be helpful for all of us.

Randahl

On 16/06/12 10.19, Tom Eugelink wrote:
> Thunderbird does recognize that this is a list; I have the option to 
> "reply" or "reply to list".
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> On 2012-06-16 10:15, Randahl Fink Isaksen wrote:
>> Sorry if this has been asked before, but why is this mailing list not 
>> configured with a reply-to header, so that e-mail programs can figure 
>> out that when we hit reply, the reply address should be openjfx and 
>> *not* the sender address?
>>
>> I keep accidentally writing replies directly to the sender, and I 
>> have noticed I am not the only one doing so.
>>
>> Randahl
>