Building v2.2 of javafx-ui-controls: com.sun.javafx.css.parser.Css2Bin not found

[Ajay Bharadwaj]

Kim, sorry about that. We're working on fixing this. 

Ajay

On May 25, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:

> Ajay,
> 
> Can you take a look at this?
> 
> -- Kevin
> 
> 
> Kim Topley wrote:
>> 
>> Looks like the link for b10 (Mac and Windows) is broken - getting a 404.
>> 
>> Kim
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com> wrote:
>> JIRA:  http://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-21827
>> 
>> This is now fixed in the 2.2/controls forest.
>> 
>> If you download 2.2-b10 from OTN, you should be able to build the 2.2/controls forest (or you can build the 2.2/master forest by applying the one line patch from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/2.2/controls/rt/rev/f9f04ca91e38 to your local clone of 2.2/master/rt).
>> 
>> -- Kevin
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> I will look into this today and make sure we can build openjfx from just the open sources.
>> 
>> -- Kevin
>> 
>> 
>> Florian Brunner wrote:
>> Any news about this issue?
>> 
>> Or should we use a different repository to build the controls such as:
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/2.2/controls/rt
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Florian
>> 
>> Am Montag 21 Mai 2012, 19:45:26 schrieb Richard Bair:
>>  
>> Hi Florian,
>> 
>> Something is wrong. We do have continuous builds, but they are humming along nicely. The problem, probably, is that our hudson builds use scripts in rt-closed to build everything, whereas here we're building with rt, where the scripts are slightly different. I will find out what is going on.
>> 
>> Richard
>> 
>> On May 21, 2012, at 6:40 AM, Florian Brunner wrote:
>> 
>>    
>> Hi Richard,
>> 
>> Thanks for your response.
>> 
>> Did you already have a chance to have a look at this?
>> 
>> Does Oracle have a continous integration server with a job for JavaFX v2.2 running? Is everything fine there? Or is it a bigger issue?
>> 
>> I just did a new checkout of the rt repository, but I'm getting the same error.
>> 
>> I'm using the following repositories:
>> 
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/2.2/master
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/2.2/master/rt
>> 
>> The class com.sun.javafx.css.parser.Css2Bin seems to be a part of javafx-ui-common. I tried to build that first, but I got other errors such as it didn't find the classes:
>> com.sun.javafx.sg.PGCanvas
>> com.sun.javafx.sg.GrowableDataBuffer
>> 
>> Where are these classes coming from?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Florian
>> 
>> Am Freitag 18 Mai 2012, 18:31:28 schrieb Richard Bair:
>>      
>> Hi Florian,
>> 
>>        
>> I'm trying to build v2.2 of javafx-ui-controls, but I get the following error:
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Buildfile: <somePath>/open-jfx/master/rt/javafx-ui-controls/build.xml
>> [taskdef] Could not load definitions from resource net/sf/antcontrib/antcontrib.properties. It could not be found.
>> 
>> check-binary-css:
>> 
>> javafx-ui-controls-common.-pre-init:
>>  [mkdir] Created dir: /home/puce/Programming/Java/projectx/JavaFX-Apps/open-jfx/2.2/open-jfx/master/rt/javafx-ui-controls/build/classes/com/sun/javafx/scene/control/skin/caspian
>>   [java] Fehler: Hauptklasse com.sun.javafx.css.parser.Css2Bin konnte nicht gefunden oder geladen werden
>> 
>> BUILD FAILED
>> <somePath>/open-jfx/master/rt/javafx-ui-controls/build-common.xml:12: Java returned: 1
>>          
>> Let me update and give it a try.
>> 
>>        
>> Should we use Ant or Maven to build the project or can we use any of the two?
>>          
>> I always use Ant, so I can make sure that works. I think maven support was added by contributions but I don't remember.
>> 
>>        
>> Also note:
>> http://openjdk.java.net/projects/openjfx/ only mentions v2.1 but not v2.2
>>          
>> Doh!
>> 
>>        
>> Another question:
>> JavaFX 2.1 has been released for Windows and Mac but not for Linux. Is there still work going on in the v2.1 repository or should we work on v2.2 now?
>>          
>> All the work is in 2.2 now, 2.1 has shipped. 2.2 by the way has just passed feature freeze, so we're in bug fix mode and then we'll be switching to 3.0 within the next month! 2.2 was a short release window.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Richard
>>        
>>    
>> 
>>  
>>