JavaFX for the Enterprise - Working Group

[Mario Torre]

"""
This thread is interesting. I've seen at J1 some tools using JavaFX
with the SWT bridge. The Swing one will also work equally well. We
also have (we need to put some love to make it work on 2.2
"""

Somehow this got cut, I meant:

This thread is interesting. I've seen at J1 some tools using JavaFX
with the SWT bridge. The Swing one will also work equally well. We
also have (we need to put some love to make it work on 2.2) that
can be used to embed Swing on top of JavaFX (the other way around).

Cheers,
Mario

2012/10/17 Mario Torre <neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com>:
> 2012/10/17 Mark Claassen <markclaassenx at gmail.com>:
>> I joined this list a few days ago because I wanted to start contributing
>> So far, I am not sure it is quite where I should be.  I would like to
>> discuss more about the components (table, list boxes, ...).  I am not
>> exactly sure where to do that.
>
> You just unfortunately ended up subscribing to this list in the middle
> of a storm :)
>
> But this list has been used in the past to discuss components and
> details of the implementation, so this is definitely the right place
> to start discussing those things.
>
> @Richard: Perhaps it would be more fun to simply have a list dedicated
> to flaming Oracle for supporting HTML 5 rather than JavaFX :)
>
>> However, I will add here that I started (a very short-lived) thread on the
>> netbeans user list along these lines.  Basically what I was saying was that
>> Netbeans is a wonderful UI built on Swing.  Could this same project be done
>> in JavaFX?  Maybe not yet, but could it be in the future?  It seems like
>> the JavaFX team could get a lot of advice and requirements from the
>> netbeans team.
>>
>> http://forums.netbeans.org/topic51717.html
>
> This thread is interesting. I've seen at J1 some tools using JavaFX
> with the SWT bridge. The Swing one will also work equally well. We
> also have (we need to put some love to make it work on 2.2
>
> The big trouble is #2, this will only work if:
>
> 1. Netbeans can ship JavaFX
> 2. JavaFX is included in any major OpenJDK/JDK releases (that means,
> including distribution related IcedTea builds).
>
> For both options, JavaFX needs to be fully Open Sourced, or even
> NetBeans will fall back into non free bits, so I agree with them.
>
>> Some of the main data structures, like the ObservableList, make me cringe.
>> I created a similar structure 10 years ago and have since learned the error
>> of my ways.  Granted, the JavaFX team has a lot more resources and
>> experience than I did all those years ago, but from my point of view, there
>> are dangerous waters ahead.
>
> I'm sure this is the kind of discussion mostly welcomed on this list,
> after all, this is what makes it a community project.
>
> Cheers,
> Mario
> --
> pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
> Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF
>
> IcedRobot: www.icedrobot.org
> Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/
> Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org
> OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/
>
> Please, support open standards:
> http://endsoftpatents.org/



-- 
pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF

IcedRobot: www.icedrobot.org
Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/
Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org
OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/

Please, support open standards:
http://endsoftpatents.org/