JNLP Change?

[Mark Howe]

Hi Daniel, I have created an issue for this https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-32590, we should be providing packager support as jar or jnlp attributes are added. 

Thanks
Mark


On Aug 26, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Daniel Zwolenski <zonski at gmail.com> wrote:

> Shouldn't/couldn't his be done by the JFX packaging tools when they sign
> the jar along with all the other junk they do?
> 
> This whole JNLP web deployment stuff just gets worse and messier. I'm
> tempted to drop support for it from the Maven plugin.
> 
> Not touching anything on this or robovm until after Java one (and tempted
> to bail on all JFX stuff depending on the outcomes - waste of time and
> energy with no return).
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Mark Fortner <phidias51 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I think that came in the last bunch of security fixes.  Adding the two
>> attributes to your manifest should take care of the problem. I'm curious
>> why the permissions information should be both in the JNLP file and in the
>> manifest.  You would think just including it in one place should be
>> sufficient.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Mark
>> 
>> I received the below issue on the JFX Maven plugin. I don't have
>> time/motivation to investigate - on the surface it looks like a JFX
>> packager problem.
>> 
>> Has JNLP changed and has JFX packager been updated to handle this change?
>> 
>> ---------------------------------
>> 
>> A couple of issues:
>> JSE1.7 u25+_ requires new attributes on jar signing meaning that running an
>> JNLP will give errors "Missing Permissions manifest attribute for
>> {jarfile}". See
>> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/jweb/no_redeploy.html
>> 
>> Secondly, field values in the JNLP are missing in the jfx config e.g. .
>> Also, I'm not seeing migrate from the main .pom to the JNLP.
>> 
>> Thanks for this great plug in!
>>