The rise and fall of Builders

Felix Bembrick felix.bembrick at gmail.com
Thu Aug 29 12:42:47 PDT 2013


Thanks Jonathan,

So what is Oracle's current position on this?  Are Builders in or out?  If
out, when will they be removed and how?


On 30 August 2013 05:31, Jonathan Giles <jonathan.giles at oracle.com> wrote:

> You can catch up on the back story here:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2013-March/006725.html
>
> -- Jonathan
>
> On 30/08/2013 7:06 a.m., Felix Bembrick wrote:
> > I was not privy to the original discussion but I am lead to believe that
> Builders are no longer considered fashionable and that we are advised not
> to use them.
> >
> > While I realise that every type of Node basically needed its own
> Builder, could someone please outline why this situation has arisen?  Is it
> something to do with "fluent APIs" themselves or some other reason?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Felix
>
>


More information about the openjfx-dev mailing list