Launching JavaFX apps

[Scott Palmer]

Yes that too.. Sorry.. there were many points in my email and I
misunderstood which you were referring to.  I will file the bug with NB
regarding the default comments in a JavaFX project.

My other comment was referring to the launcher.exe that JavaFX packager
uses and that is of course a JavaFX issue.  RT-35271 specifically.


Thanks,

Scott



On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Alexander Kouznetsov <
alexander.kouznetsov at oracle.com> wrote:

>  Scott,
>
> I didn't get that. Are you saying that main() method javadoc is correct?
>
> Best regards,
> Alexander Kouznetsov(408) 276-0387
>
> On 15 янв 2014 16:40, Scott Palmer wrote:
>
> Thanks.  I'm participating in NetCat 8.0 so I'm well aware of that link
> :-).  But this doesn't appear to be a NetBeans issue.  Inclusion of
> metadata into the launcher stub is not implemented in the javafxpackager
> command line tool or ant task as far as I can tell. (I'm using the gradle
> plugin mainly at this point, but it just delegates to the ant task as far
> as I can tell.)
>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Scott
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Alexander Kouznetsov <
> alexander.kouznetsov at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> Here is the link to file a bug on NetBeans:
>> http://netbeans.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alexander Kouznetsov
>> (408) 276-0387
>>
>>
>> On 8 янв 2014 18:45, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So yes, it does seem that Netbeans should modify the wording of their
>>> javadoc comment for the main() method of a JavaFX application.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>