JavaFX features in JDK 9

[Kevin Rushforth]

JavaFX accessibility is already implemented and was delivered in JDK 8u40.

-- Kevin


Michał Zegan wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> What about accessibility work? Work on it has been started, but not
> sure if it is still targetted for 9.
>
> W dniu 2015-06-27 o 20:16, Mike pisze:
>   
>> a lot of FULL blown Webrtc support and building something in Javafx
>> (like Scene Builder) that Proves Webrtc support would be awesome.
>> Ditto to Webgl support.
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Kevin Rushforth
>> <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
>>     
>>> wrote:
>>>       
>>> Hi Felix,
>>>
>>> Sorry for the delay. Most of us were still pretty focused on
>>> 8u60, but we are turning our attention to JDK 9 now.
>>>
>>> The focus for JDK 9 is Jigsaw. The currently planned big features
>>> (JEPs) for FX in JDK 9 are these:
>>>
>>> JEP 253: Prepare JavaFX UI Controls & CSS APIs for
>>> Modularization JEP 257: Update JavaFX/Media to Newer Version of
>>> GStreamer
>>>
>>> Related to Jigasw, we intend to look into new API for heavily
>>> used internal methods / classes since they will no longer be
>>> accessible otherwise. We also plan to update WebKit at least one
>>> more time, and will likely do a few RFEs such as better Hi-DPI
>>> support (with API control) on Mac, Windows, Linux.
>>>
>>> We don't currently plan any other big features for 9, but will
>>> consider additional RFEs if they are important to enough
>>> developers and if they fit into the time frame.
>>>
>>> -- Kevin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Felix Bembrick wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Anyone got anything or is there a link somewhere that talks
>>>> about these?
>>>>
>>>> On 15 June 2015 at 22:00, Felix Bembrick
>>>> <felix.bembrick at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> I realise we are a long way off JDK 9 still and with crucial
>>>>> features such as Jigsaw still a little up in the air but is
>>>>> it possible someone could itemise the most likely new
>>>>> features, enhancements and bug fixes that we will see in
>>>>> JavaFX when JDK 9 is released?
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course it's purely speculation at this point but it would
>>>>> assist me greatly to have some of idea of where JavaFX is
>>>>> heading and which areas are seen as most important.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Felix
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVju0bAAoJEHb1CzgxXKwYYRAP/iPJ43tu3Q56oXLr+SjD+Qqc
> xtBs9Fb3k3FJlPmqDlq3mbvW4RkpGNDUi71OlocYJ1v5C719samTd1mqpKHubJj7
> 0mZHUmISswaJRcnXnXmIQL8i7tX+XvK2JSHV8mwEcZ7rCIHAz2qxxQMnAlGKw7MV
> tSzWtTCAuSjI7auN8Lew2lmAXD9NRe3+Tuyq4tcWK9O3UTI5CZl1KiX4MTS6/wGU
> xJVr+k1EMMVckOUhRkLfNy332x/dsxdvw0dBo+7P8h/mKZWYcDGop/z3YLRj0zAx
> /JEKaGLsJa72Mn2X8kTnzNRNXkrHKoomp7J0jnWrrys6n7fR9712neIkU9x8+cqU
> Lcuo19yPhUFaarBZS1YE/aA7SLZ25aKOlyq0WhWTv/SPzOTsWy4zccA0mXKat2NR
> otHimPOwQoK/Bk3XKb1DdLF9prpN207T9dQKS5hisYdwAoGpm92QtEjLz0YShM6K
> a74KjmtH5siUu6dLFGgbDFrfbPRIN3EnShPtQ66pXeNkBUsdFbet0nGnsLfquVee
> 3NfDg/LlworKlH86ZNHywTZzFNanPqFEL532M+kqlnuAMhw0hen5SGFy25xhDe1S
> urcnhaCFY1pdiefwMt9kOGEqFDMx1wQGQSbzIn+7B9a5HJAScB+cfO1GU/iUGcmH
> to+Ebbq5p3a8y1OeQVCt
> =SPDE
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>