QML vs. FXML

[Doug Schaefer]

Yes :). Tom has dome some great work supporting JavaFX in the community.

Now, I think you still need to compile FXGraph to something. The important
requirement for declarative UI is the quick edit/reload cycle. Having the
³compiler² in the run-time would be needed for that, which is what QML,
and FXML for that matter, offer.

On 2015-03-05, 10:55 AM, "Werner Lehmann" <lehmann at media-interactive.de>
wrote:

>Like this?
>
>http://wiki.eclipse.org/Efxclipse/Tooling/FXGraph
>
>On 05.03.2015 16:23, Doug Schaefer wrote:
>> You really want to use a domain specific language that¹s easy to read
>> and write. QML is that. I find XML tags overwhelm the rest of the
>> text making it hard to understand what¹s going on, and hard to write
>> unless you have a good XML editor.  QML has less cruft and it¹s
>> easier to see what¹s happening with a quick glance.
>