OpenJFX mirror at BitBucket?

[dalibor topic]

On 18.03.2015 01:03, Tomas Mikula wrote:
> Legal issues could be resolved by requiring a signed OCA before each
> pull request is merged.

Or we could simply require changes to come in the way we do now and 
avoid having to deal with another set of side issues altogether.

A development model where individual contributors work on their own 
individual changes, and then submit them separately is much easier to 
deal with for reviewers than one where some random things happen on 
bitbucket, someone after a while sends in a random pull request and then 
you have to spend weeks sorting out who contributed to the files in the 
pull request, how to contact them, if they are covered under the OCA, etc.

cheers,
dalibor topic
-- 
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Kunz

Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher

<http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
practices and products that help protect the environment