What does this mean for the future of JavaFX on iOS?
Felix Bembrick
felix.bembrick at gmail.com
Mon Apr 18 17:07:56 UTC 2016
So what do they use instead?
> On 19 Apr 2016, at 02:52, Steve Hannah <steve at weblite.ca> wrote:
>
> According to Gluon, they're not impacted by this.
> https://twitter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784161728471041
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Felix Bembrick <felix.bembrick at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I just read this article which states that RoboVM is effectively "shutting
>> down".
>>
>> https://www.voxxed.com/blog/2016/04/robovm/
>>
>> Given that they seem to be a critical part of the puzzle that is making
>> JavaFX viable on mobile platforms, what does this actually mean for that
>> goal?
>>
>> Is there an alternative technology or product that can fill this void? Or
>> is the final nail in the coffin for JavaFX to ever be a truly viable cross
>> platform technology?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Felix
>
>
>
>
> --
> Steve Hannah
> Web Lite Solutions Corp.
>
> --94eb2c0561622831410530c52f17
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <div dir=3D"ltr">According to Gluon, they're not impacted by this.<div>=
> <a href=3D"https://twitter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784161728471041">https://t=
> witter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784161728471041</a><br></div><div><br></div><d=
> iv><br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote=
> ">On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Felix Bembrick <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a =
> href=3D"mailto:felix.bembrick at gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">felix.bembrick at g=
> mail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
> =3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I just r=
> ead this article which states that RoboVM is effectively "shutting dow=
> n".<br>
> <br>
> <a href=3D"https://www.voxxed.com/blog/2016/04/robovm/" rel=3D"noreferrer" =
> target=3D"_blank">https://www.voxxed.com/blog/2016/04/robovm/</a><br>
> <br>
> Given that they seem to be a critical part of the puzzle that is making Jav=
> aFX viable on mobile platforms, what does this actually mean for that goal?=
> <br>
> <br>
> Is there an alternative technology or product that can fill this void? Or i=
> s the final nail in the coffin for JavaFX to ever be a truly viable cross p=
> latform technology?<br>
> <br>
> Thanks,<br>
> <br>
> Felix</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div cl=
> ass=3D"gmail_signature">Steve Hannah<div>Web Lite Solutions Corp.</div></di=
> v>
> </div>
>
> --94eb2c0561622831410530c52f17--
> --94eb2c0561622831410530c52f17
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> According to Gluon, they're not impacted by this.
> https://twitter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784161728471041
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Felix Bembrick <felix.bembrick at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I just read this article which states that RoboVM is effectively "shutting
>> down".
>>
>> https://www.voxxed.com/blog/2016/04/robovm/
>>
>> Given that they seem to be a critical part of the puzzle that is making
>> JavaFX viable on mobile platforms, what does this actually mean for that
>> goal?
>>
>> Is there an alternative technology or product that can fill this void? Or
>> is the final nail in the coffin for JavaFX to ever be a truly viable cross
>> platform technology?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Felix
>
>
>
>
> --
> Steve Hannah
> Web Lite Solutions Corp.
>
> --94eb2c0561622831410530c52f17
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <div dir=3D"ltr">According to Gluon, they're not impacted by this.<div>=
> <a href=3D"https://twitter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784161728471041">https://t=
> witter.com/GluonHQ/status/721784161728471041</a><br></div><div><br></div><d=
> iv><br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote=
> ">On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Felix Bembrick <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a =
> href=3D"mailto:felix.bembrick at gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">felix.bembrick at g=
> mail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
> =3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I just r=
> ead this article which states that RoboVM is effectively "shutting dow=
> n".<br>
> <br>
> <a href=3D"https://www.voxxed.com/blog/2016/04/robovm/" rel=3D"noreferrer" =
> target=3D"_blank">https://www.voxxed.com/blog/2016/04/robovm/</a><br>
> <br>
> Given that they seem to be a critical part of the puzzle that is making Jav=
> aFX viable on mobile platforms, what does this actually mean for that goal?=
> <br>
> <br>
> Is there an alternative technology or product that can fill this void? Or i=
> s the final nail in the coffin for JavaFX to ever be a truly viable cross p=
> latform technology?<br>
> <br>
> Thanks,<br>
> <br>
> Felix</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div cl=
> ass=3D"gmail_signature">Steve Hannah<div>Web Lite Solutions Corp.</div></di=
> v>
> </div>
>
> --94eb2c0561622831410530c52f17--
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list