[9] Review request: JDK-8170979: Update for Jigsaw etc. the openFX functional tests

Yuri Nesterenko yuri.nesterenko at oracle.com
Thu Dec 22 09:07:23 UTC 2016


A new version is here:
  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8170979/webrev.01
(trailing spaces removed).
See also discussion in the bug report:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170979
thank you, Kevin!

-yan

On 12/21/2016 12:19 PM, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
> A gentle reminder.
> Without this change, we have to make All Test Run out of
> the makeshift workspace.
>
> Thanks,
> -yan
>
> On 12/09/2016 02:02 PM, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
>> Colleagues,
>>
>> please review this test bug fix:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8170979/webrev.00/
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170979
>>
>>
>> The changes are mostly in tests/functional/.
>>
>> This is a merge of current testbase in
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/9-dev/tests and whatever
>> we have internally. The tests should now compile and work
>> with Jigsaw (including b148, --add-opens), recognize already
>> not too new JDK directory structure, do not use Builders etc.
>> Small number of tests was excluded and even dropped for various
>> reasons.
>> Several suites were tested with b142-b146 and PIT build for
>> the recent Jigsaw update (re: --add-opens).
>>
>> There are still some reservations and unanswered questions.
>> For instance, a hard monotonous work of creation and maintaining
>> of the so called golden images is up to a tester: I don't know a
>> good place to share them between independent teams.
>> A couple of the suites still won't start without a minor
>> reconfiguration beforehand, not always properly documented.
>> We intend to use this state of the tests for the next massive test run
>> starting from jdk9 b150.
>



More information about the openjfx-dev mailing list