ProgressIndicator indeterminate transition bugs
Cirujano Cuesta, Diego
diego.cirujano-cuesta at zeiss.com
Sun Feb 28 22:30:38 UTC 2016
Hi Jonathan:
I thought they would be reopened that´s why I did not create them. Here there are:
JI-9029954
JI-9029955
By the way I also created another one for a few weeks (28.01.2016) JI-9029025 but I did not receive anything else.
I do not know if I am creating the bugs in a wrong place or what. I am using: http://bugreport.java.com/
What can I do in order to write comments in the JBS bugs?
Thanks,
Diego
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Giles [mailto:jonathan.giles at oracle.com]
Sent: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2016 22:54
To: Cirujano Cuesta, Diego; openjfx-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: ProgressIndicator indeterminate transition bugs
If you can, are you able to file bug reports for these?
-- Jonathan
On 29/02/16 10:49 AM, Cirujano Cuesta, Diego wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We found two important bugs in ProgressIndicator that are related with the following tickets:
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8094829
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8094078
>
> Now are quite critical because in a 4K monitor may cause OutOfMemoryException.
>
> Using the following example:
> "
> public class JFXMain extends Application{
>
> @Override
> public void start(Stage primaryStage) throws Exception {
> HBox root = new HBox();
> ToggleButton toggleButton = new ToggleButton();
> ProgressIndicator progressIndicator = new ProgressIndicator(ProgressIndicator.INDETERMINATE_PROGRESS);
> StackPane stackPane = new StackPane(progressIndicator);
> stackPane.visibleProperty().bind(toggleButton.selectedProperty());
> root.getChildren().addAll(toggleButton, stackPane);
> primaryStage.setScene(new Scene(root));
> primaryStage.show();
> }
> }
> "
>
> ** First bug **
>
> Starting the Progress Indicator with indeterminate progress will
> trigger: rebuildTimeline by ProgressIndicatorSkin and in line 599
> start the animation even is not shown already:
> indeterminateTransition.playFromStart();
>
> ** Second bug **
>
> With the last commits in ProgressIndicator, as commented in JDK-8094829, the listeners do not care about the real visibility of the node(before it was used impl_treeVisibleProperty()). The consequence is that the ProgressIndicator in the example won´t be stopped.
>
> I can imagine that impl_treeVisibleProperty() should not be used and Jonathan G. said: " but I can't reliably fix that without an API such as what I expect the treeVisible API should do." But we did not find such alternative property.
>
> The solution we though is the usage of internal tree visible property like this:
>
> 1. Modify method:
> "
> protected void updateAnimation(boolean isTreeVisible) { "
> 2. Remove current calls to method in
> "
> @Override protected void handleControlPropertyChanged(String p) {
> super.handleControlPropertyChanged(p);
>
> if ("INDETERMINATE".equals(p)) {
> initialize();
> } else if ("PROGRESS".equals(p)) {
> updateProgress();
> }
> }
> "
> 3. Add listener at the end of the IndeterminateSpinner contructor the visibility listener:
> "
> private IndeterminateSpinner(boolean spinEnabled, Paint fillOverride) {
> [...]
> impl_treeVisibleProperty().addListener((obs, oldVal, newVal) ->{
> updateAnimation(newVal);
> });
> }
> "
>
> What do you think?
>
> Additional note: I would like to add one more thing. I think that could be very good a property ReadOnlyBooleanProperty treeVisibleProperty() available in all Nodes.
>
> Please let me know if we can do something else.
>
> Diego
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list