JavaFX 9 & FXCanvas

[dalibor topic]

On 15.06.2016 07:36, Alexander Nyßen wrote:
> Would it require he (as well as all GEF committers that worked on the mentioned fixes) would have to sign the OCA as well?

If there are multiple authors to a contribution, then they all need to 
have an OCA on file. If one or more contributions are done on behalf of 
an organization, such as a company, than that organization needs to have 
an OCA on file, as well. Details are discussed in the OCA FAQ, available 
at http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/oca-faq-405384.pdf .

> Is there any experience on how to transfer EPL-licensed code already?

No.

Fwiw, I don't think that kind of transfer would work, in general. 
Contributions need to come in under OCA or an equivalent.

As a general aside, while I don't know how the specific code in question 
was authored by whom on whose behalf, putting in all the work necessary 
to unravel the history of third party code in order to understand who 
can contribute what, if anything, could be more work and more time 
consuming than coming up with a better & novel solution from scratch, if 
it's 'just' a couple of bug fixes.

cheers,
dalibor topic

-- 
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher

<http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
practices and products that help protect the environment