review: Generate bss for all css files, remove TODO
Kevin Rushforth
kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
Mon Apr 3 20:22:11 UTC 2017
Inline
David Hill wrote:
> On 3/30/17, 1:57 PM, David Grieve wrote:
>> The question I have about this change is, do you necessarily want all
>> of the css/bss files that may be in that directory in the dist? If
>> someone adds a css file in the future, should it be a conscience
>> decision to put it into the dist?
> David,
>
> Certainly a valid question, and one that was answered "yes", at least
> so far.
> We already as shipping the .css files but only converting some of them.
>
> This change means we ship the bss to go with them.
Exactly. By converting them all we treat them the same way as .java -->
.class files are handled. All .java files are compiled and all generated
.class files are included by default.
> The gradle code block can easily tolerate the addition of exclusions
> if needed.
Indeed. We can filter them like we do with .class files in some cases.
> The other part of the question was if we even should ship the .css
> files a all and css2bin. To shorten a long conversation, continuing to
> do so allows widget developers access to them, access we have no other
> standard way of providing.
This seems like it should be a separate question, and dealt with as a
separate JBS issue, if we decide there is good reason to stop delivering
the .css files. I don't think we have a compelling reason to exclude them.
-- Kevin
> Dave
>>
>>
>> On 3/30/17 1:50 PM, David Hill wrote:
>>>
>>> Jonathan,
>>> please review this change automating the CSS to BSS conversion in
>>> our build
>>> The list of 6 newly converted files as well as the existing ones are
>>> in the JBS.
>>> So 9 existing plus 6 new = 15.
>>>
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8174944
>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddhill/8174944/
>>>
>>
>
>
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list