[9] Review request: 8178015: Clarify requirement for app modules to export/open packages to javafx modules

[Mandy Chung]

> On Apr 18, 2017, at 12:48 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Alan Bateman wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 18/04/2017 19:19, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>>> Good suggestion. Here is an updated webrev with Mandy's suggestion and yours:
>>> 
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8178015/webrev.01/
>>> 
>>> -- Kevin
>> This looks mostly okay.
>> 
>> I guess for FXML then I assume that the annotated member could be public, in which case the package just needs to be exported (no need to open).
> 
> Yes, it could be, but the more typical use of the annotation is on non-public members, so that was why I chose that as the example.

I have the same comment as Alan.  The example in the javadoc may be perceived as a recommendation.  We should probably recommend the annotated member be moved to public and encapsulated in its module, just exports it to javafx.fxml to use.  

Mandy