Proposal For Inclusion of Robot and ParametersImpl in the Public API

Michael Ennen mike.ennen at gmail.com
Tue Dec 5 01:11:42 UTC 2017


Correction:

Adding ""--add-exports javafx.graphics/javafx.scene.robot=ALL-UNNAMED" to
buildSrc/addExports.

For posterity :)

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Michael Ennen <mike.ennen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ah, indeed, missed adding "--add-opens javafx.graphics/javafx.scene.robot=ALL-UNNAMED"
> to buildSrc/addExports.
> Thanks for the guidance on that.
>
> I will continue to work on this in the GitHub repo and polish it up (add
> javadocs, better method signatures, etc.) and
> even plan on maybe improving the underlying native Robot implementations
> (for example fixing/improving the
> way color profiles are handled for MacRobot).
>
> I will also take a look at "fixing" JemmyFX to use the new public API (as
> well as any other place in the JavaFX code
> base that does).
>
> I was expecting that JDK 11 would be the appropriate time frame,
> especially because it will be the release where
> private APIs will be totally inaccessible, correct?
>
> After I get it in a reasonable state should I post back on this mailing
> list thread or what would be the appropriate
> way?
>
> Thanks Kevin.
>
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Kevin Rushforth <
> kevin.rushforth at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> This is a limitation of the the way --patch-modules works. You will need
>> to add an entry in:
>>
>> buildSrc/addExports
>>
>> Btw, as for the proposal itself, this might need to be a JEP depending on
>> the scope. In any case, it could be considered in the JDK 11 time frame,
>> but there are several things that need to be worked out before making Robot
>> a public API, including the fact that the JemmyFX framework in the
>> openjfx/jfx/tests directory uses Robot. Once you get a working prototype,
>> it would be interesting to discuss it in more detail.
>>
>> -- Kevin
>>
>>
>>
>> Michael Ennen wrote:
>>
>> Currently I am stuck with tests not being able to see the new
>> "javafx.scene.robot" module:
>>
>>
>>
>> Task :systemTests:compileTestJava
>>
>>
>> C:\Users\brcolow\dev\openjfx\tests\system\src\test\java\test\robot\com\sun\glass\ui\monocle\ModalDialogTest.java:34:
>> error: package javafx.scene.robot is not visible
>> import javafx.scene.robot.Robot;
>>                    ^
>>   (package javafx.scene.robot is declared in module javafx.graphics, which
>> does not export it)
>> C:\Users\brcolow\dev\openjfx\tests\system\src\test\java\test\robot\com\sun\glass\ui\monocle\RobotTest.java:33:
>> error: package javafx.scene.robot is not visible
>> import javafx.scene.robot.Robot;
>>
>> I have added:
>>
>>     exports javafx.scene.robot;
>>
>> to: modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/module-info.java
>>
>> But this does not seem to be enough.
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Michael Ennen <mike.ennen at gmail.com> <mike.ennen at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I am still working on all the necessary changes to actually allow openjfx
>> to compile.
>> Tons to learn in that arena and I know the code as it is written won't
>> totally work.
>> For example one can no longer:
>>
>> #include "com_sun_glass_ui_Robot.h"
>>
>> as in openjfx\modules\javafx.graphics\src\main\native-glass\win\Robot.cpp
>>
>> But I am not sure how those headers are generated and if I can just simply
>> change
>> it to "#include javafx_scene_robot_Robot.h" (which I very much doubt).
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Michael Ennen <mike.ennen at gmail.com> <mike.ennen at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I have created a (small) proposal (building on the work of Benjamin
>> Gudehaus) about moving some classes in to the public API so that TestFX (a
>> JavaFX UI testing framework) can continue to work with future JDK releases.
>> The somewhat nicely formatted proposal can be found as a Github gist:
>> https://gist.github.com/brcolow/26370db6cab0355186d4a1d13b30fc19
>>
>> All suggested changes can be found by using Github Compare View:
>> https://github.com/brcolow/openjfx/compare/4ccdbbbce5234e2c5
>> e1f4f1cb8f20430feaa53b6...master
>>
>> But I have copied it to this email for convenience:
>>
>> ----------------------- PROPOSAL -----------------------
>>
>> TestFX, the JavaFX GUI testing framework currently requires 4 (four)
>> classes that are part of the JDK's private API. They are:
>>
>> [com.sun.glass.ui.Application](http://hg.openjdk.java.net/op
>> enjfx/10-dev/rt/file/tip/modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/
>> java/com/sun/glass/ui/Application.java)
>> [com.sun.glass.ui.Pixels](http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx
>> /10-dev/rt/file/tip/modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/
>> com/sun/glass/ui/Pixels.java)
>> [com.sun.glass.ui.Robot](http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/
>> 10-dev/rt/file/tip/modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/com
>> /sun/glass/ui/Robot.java)
>> [com.sun.javafx.application.ParametersImpl](http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/10-dev/rt/file/tip/modules/javafx.
>> graphics/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/application/ParametersImpl.java <http://k.java.net/openjfx/10-dev/rt/file/tip/modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/application/ParametersImpl.java>)
>>
>> In order to compile the project with Java 9, we use the following flags:
>>
>> ```sh
>> --add-exports javafx.graphics/com.sun.glass.ui=org.testfx
>> --add-exports javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.application=org.testfx
>> ```
>>
>> If the --add-exports flags are disabled in a future Java release TestFX
>> will require these four classes to be moved into the public API to
>> continue working.
>>
>> While these classes are probably not very useful for applications to use
>> directly, any JavaFX application wanting to write UI tests will most
>> likely
>> use TestFX and thus they will indirectly be using these classes.
>>
>> JavaFX internal tests also use these classes for essentially the same
>> purpose (UI tests).
>>
>> ### Details of Usage For Each Private API Class
>>
>> #### com.sun.javafx.application.ParametersImpl
>>
>> ##### TestFX Usage
>>
>> ```java
>> ParametersImpl parameters = new ParametersImpl(applicationArgs);
>> ParametersImpl.registerParameters(application, parameters);
>> ```
>>
>> The parameters are set on a constructed Application.
>>
>> ##### Suggested Public API Replacement
>>
>> `javafx.application.Application`:
>>
>> ```java
>> /**
>>  * Sets the parameters for this Application.
>>  *
>>  * <p>
>>  * NOTE: this method should not be called from the Application
>> constructor,
>>  * as it will return null. It may be called in the init() method or any
>>  * time after that.
>>  * </p>
>>  *
>>  * @param parameters the parameters to set for this Application
>>  */
>> public final Parameters setParameters(String... parameters) {
>>     ParametersImpl parameters = new ParametersImpl(parameters);
>>     ParametersImpl.registerParameters(this, parameters);
>> }
>> ```
>>
>> #### com.sun.glass.ui.Application
>>
>> ##### TestFX Usage
>>
>> ```java
>> return Application.GetApplication().createRobot();
>> ```
>>
>> The Application class is used to instantiate a Robot.
>>
>> ##### Suggested Public API Replacement
>>
>> `javafx.application.Application`:
>> https://github.com/brcolow/openjfx/blob/master/modules/javaf
>> x.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/application/Application.java#L527
>>
>> #### com.sun.glass.ui.Pixels
>>
>> ##### TestFX Usage
>>
>> ```java
>> @Override
>> public Image getCaptureRegion(Rectangle2D region) {
>>     return waitForAsyncFx(RETRIEVAL_TIMEOUT_IN_MILLIS, () -> {
>>         Pixels glassPixels = useRobot().getScreenCapture(
>>             (int) region.getMinX(), (int) region.getMinY(),
>>             (int) region.getWidth(), (int) region.getHeight()
>>         );
>>         return convertFromGlassPixels(glassPixels);
>>     });
>> }
>>
>> private Image convertFromGlassPixels(Pixels glassPixels) {
>>     int width = glassPixels.getWidth();
>>     int height = glassPixels.getHeight();
>>     WritableImage image = new WritableImage(width, height);
>>
>>     int bytesPerComponent = glassPixels.getBytesPerComponent();
>>     if (bytesPerComponent == INT_BUFFER_BYTES_PER_COMPONENT) {
>>         IntBuffer intBuffer = (IntBuffer) glassPixels.getPixels();
>>         writeIntBufferToImage(intBuffer, image);
>>     }
>>
>>     return image;
>> }
>>
>> private void writeIntBufferToImage(IntBuffer intBuffer,
>>                                    WritableImage image) {
>>     PixelWriter pixelWriter = image.getPixelWriter();
>>     double width = image.getWidth();
>>     double height = image.getHeight();
>>
>>     for (int y = 0; y < height; y++) {
>>         for (int x = 0; x < width; x++) {
>>             int argb = intBuffer.get();
>>             pixelWriter.setArgb(x, y, argb);
>>         }
>>     }
>> }
>> ```
>>
>> Pixels is used to create a screen capture.
>>
>> ##### Suggested Public API Replacement
>>
>> Bypass needing to expose the Pixels class to the public API by
>> changing the getScreenCapture method of Robot - that is, changing:
>>
>> `public Pixels getScreenCapture(int x, int y, int width, int height)`
>>
>> to:
>>
>> `public Image getScreenCapture(int x, int y, int width, int height)`
>>
>> #### com.sun.glass.ui.Robot
>>
>> ##### TestFX Usage
>>
>> Essentially every method of Robot is used:
>>
>> ```
>> public void keyPress(int code)
>> public void keyRelease(int code)
>> public int getMouseX()
>> public int getMouseY()
>> public void mouseMove(int x, int y)
>> public void mousePress(int buttons)
>> public void mouseRelease(int buttons)
>> public void mouseWheel(int wheelAmt)
>> public int getPixelColor(int x, int y)
>> public Pixels getScreenCapture(int x, int y, int width, int height)
>> ```
>>
>> ##### Suggested Public API Replacement
>> https://github.com/brcolow/openjfx/blob/master/modules/javaf
>> x.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/scene/robot/Robot.java
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael Ennen
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael Ennen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Michael Ennen
>



-- 
Michael Ennen


More information about the openjfx-dev mailing list