Testing your JavaFX applications on JDK 9

[Jonathan Giles]

Platform.firePulse() never existed, you're probably thinking of 
Toolkit.firePulse() (which is not public API)?

A close replacement is Platform.requestNextPulse().

-- Jonathan

On 17/01/17 10:00 AM, Tom Eugelink wrote:
> One of the methods I use a lot in Tests, to make sure something has 
> happened, is:
>     runAndWait( () -> Platform.firePulse() );
>
> firePulse no longer exists. Is there a replacement?
>
> The rest seems to compile ok. But I cannot run the tests ATM.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11-1-2017 20:14, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> As you may know JDK 9 has hit the feature extension complete 
>> milestone [1]. We still have a small number of weeks to fix P1-P3 
>> bugs, but we need to know about them in order to fix them. Our focus 
>> will be on bugs that are new in JDK 9 (regressions).
>>
>> I ask all JavaFX developers to please download JDK 9 early access [2] 
>> and test your application. You can report any bugs via bugs.java.com 
>> [3]. If you have any questions about whether a behavior is a bug or 
>> is expected, please ask on this alias or on the jigsaw-dev alias [4].
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> -- Kevin
>>
>> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/
>> [2] https://jdk9.java.net/download/
>> [3] http://bugreport.java.com/
>> [4] jigsaw-dev at openjdk.java.net
>>
>