[9] Review request: 8180040: Exclude jdk.packager module from unified JDK 9 docs

[Mandy Chung]

> On May 9, 2017, at 6:52 PM, Kevin Rushforth <Kevin.Rushforth at oracle.COM> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the review. We currently don't use package-info.java anywhere, but I can file a separate bug for converting all of our package.html to package-info.java.

That’d be good.

> I can add the the missing copyright headers at the same time.
> 

OK.

No need for an updated webrev.

Mandy

> -- Kevin
> 
> 
> Mandy Chung wrote:
>> 
>>> On May 9, 2017, at 6:08 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com> <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Please review the following to exclude jdk.packager module from the JDK docs bundle:
>>> 
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180040 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8180040>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8180040/webrev.00/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8180040/webrev.00/>
>>> 
>>> I also added a missing package description for the jdk.packager.services package (in the jdk.packager.services module), since the jdk.packager.services module will remain in the docs.
>>>     
>> 
>> I suggest to convert package.html to package-info.java.  Also need copyright header.
>> 
>> build.properties change looks fine.
>> 
>> Mandy