JDK-8200587: Fix mistakes in FX API docs
Nir Lisker
nlisker at gmail.com
Mon Apr 2 19:44:25 UTC 2018
>
> Thanks for creating this bug and providing a fix. I'll take a look in the
> next day or so.
I actually didn't link a Webrev yet as I'm waiting a couple of days to see
if someone want to add something. I'll sent a review request when I upload
the fix.
- Nir
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 10:11 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
> wrote:
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Iv'e created another issue for collecting JavaDoc corrections:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200587. If you found any,
>> please add them to this issue and I'll fix them along with what's there
>> already.
>>
>
> Thanks for creating this bug and providing a fix. I'll take a look in the
> next day or so.
>
>
> Kevin,
>>
>> * Different items on the list affect different versions, but they are all
>> relevant for the latest 11ea build. If there are plans to backport they
>> would need to be sorted out. One of them is a regression from 8 (in
>> Dialog), but it's trivial.
>>
>
> OK, thanks for the info. We have no plans to backport any of these.
>
> * I collected 2 recent issues into this one (links in the issue), so
>> should I close them as duplicates?
>>
>
> Yes, please.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Thanks,
>> Nir
>>
>
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list