JDK-8200587: Fix mistakes in FX API docs
Kevin Rushforth
kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
Mon Apr 2 19:49:26 UTC 2018
That sounds like a good idea.
-- Kevin
Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> Thanks for creating this bug and providing a fix. I'll take a look
> in the next day or so.
>
>
> I actually didn't link a Webrev yet as I'm waiting a couple of days to
> see if someone want to add something. I'll sent a review request when
> I upload the fix.
>
> - Nir
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 10:11 PM, Kevin Rushforth
> <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Iv'e created another issue for collecting JavaDoc corrections:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200587
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200587>. If you
> found any, please add them to this issue and I'll fix them
> along with what's there already.
>
>
> Thanks for creating this bug and providing a fix. I'll take a look
> in the next day or so.
>
>
> Kevin,
>
> * Different items on the list affect different versions, but
> they are all relevant for the latest 11ea build. If there are
> plans to backport they would need to be sorted out. One of
> them is a regression from 8 (in Dialog), but it's trivial.
>
>
> OK, thanks for the info. We have no plans to backport any of these.
>
> * I collected 2 recent issues into this one (links in the
> issue), so should I close them as duplicates?
>
>
> Yes, please.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Thanks,
> Nir
>
>
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list