OpenJFX GitHub mirror

[Johan Vos]

+1

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:30 PM Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>
wrote:

> Any further comments on this? If not, then I propose we start using the
> JBS label:
>
>     github-bug
>
> To identify JBS issues that are linked to guthub issues and/or PRs
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> Nir Lisker wrote:
> > I think that the labels should be succinct, so one label should suffice.
> > Either github-link or github-bug are fine for me, the latter because
> there
> > is webbug label already. If a PR needs review just use the review-request
> > existing label.
> >
> > As for issues and PRs, the issue links section in the JIRA ticket could
> > reflect what exists in GitHub, so there can be 2 web links named "GitHub
> > issue" and "GitHub PR" if need be.
> >
> > - Nir
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Tom Schindl <
> tom.schindl at bestsolution.at>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> well could we have 2:
> >> * github-issue
> >> * github-pr
> >>
> >> The first one indicates someone is working on it over at github, whereas
> >> the second means there's a PR that needs to be review.
> >>
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> On 29.03.18 08:42, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> As such github references point to either issue or PR, I recommend
> using
> >>> the term 'github-link'.
> >>>
> >>> Laurent
> >>>
> >>> Le jeu. 29 mars 2018 à 03:40, Kevin Rushforth <
> >>>
> >> kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>
> >>
> >>> a écrit :
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> I think this would be fine. We would want something that didn't
> conflict
> >>>> with anything else and wasn't confusing. Possible choices:
> >>>>
> >>>> github-link
> >>>> github-bug
> >>>> gitbug-issue
> >>>>
> >>>> Any preferences?
> >>>>
> >>>> -- Kevin
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Nir Lisker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Kevin, can we get a label for this?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Nir
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Johan Vos <johan.vos at gluonhq.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Nir,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> About 4. (jfx-dev): you're right, I just removed that repository.
> That
> >>>>>>
> >>>> was
> >>>>
> >>>>>> just some testing before we did the real thing.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> As for the other points: I agree
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - Johan
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 12:03 PM Nir Lisker <nlisker at gmail.com>
> >>>>>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A few comments about the mirror and JBS:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 1. In PRs and issues on GitHub, I strongly suggest that the link to
> >>>>>>>
> >>>> JBS be
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> included in the top comment. If the JBS issue was created after a
> >>>>>>> discussion, edit it in.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2. In JBS, I suggest to link to the GitHub mirror via More > Link >
> >>>>>>>
> >> Web
> >>
> >>>>>>> Link and in the Link Text use something like "GitHub mirror" (open
> >>>>>>>
> >> for
> >>
> >>>>>>> suggestions). JIRA renders the link in an easy to see way (easier
> >>>>>>>
> >> than
> >>
> >>>>>>> looking at URLs). Iv'e tried it in a couple of issues, e.g.,
> >>>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198795 and it seems
> >>>>>>>
> >>>> preferable
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>> me.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 3. In JBS, I suggest a new label will be used for issues which are
> >>>>>>>
> >>>> linked
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> to GitHub for search purposes. This is similar to the webbug label.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If these are agreeable, please add them to the contribution
> >>>>>>>
> >>>> instructions.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> 4. What is https://github.com/javafxports/jfx-dev? Newcomers can
> >>>>>>>
> >>>> confuse
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>> with javafxports/openjdk-jfx.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 5. When the mirror is fully ready and operational, we should
> >>>>>>>
> >> advertise
> >>
> >>>> on
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> community pages (like Reddit) to gather up contributors. Please
> keep
> >>>>>>>
> >> a
> >>
> >>>>>>> mental reminder when the time comes.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks to all who are working on this.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> - Nir
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
>