ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException with openjfx 11-ea+23, run from gradle
Lennart Börjeson
lenborje at gmail.com
Fri Aug 24 08:16:02 UTC 2018
Most probable! Your ref [1] states fix for that is Gradle #6170, which was resolved and merged after 4.9 was release. I'll test again when 4.10 is out.
/Lennart
> 23 aug. 2018 kl. 17:40 skrev Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>:
>
> Maybe you hit Gradle #3468 [1], which I discovered as reported in JDK-8193288 [2]?
>
> -- Kevin
>
> [1] https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/3468 <https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/3468>
> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193288 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8193288>
>
>
> On 8/23/2018 6:36 AM, Lennart Börjeson wrote:
>> I stopped my gradle demons (I had one for each JDK I'm testing) and after restart, everything works with either Java 10 or 11, and both openjfx 11-ea+19 and 11-ea+23 works now.
>>
>> My "real" application I'm porting to java11+openjfx also runs OK.
>>
>> (Oh well, just another gradle oddity then.)
>>
>> So, now you can update your samples to 11-ea+23 with confidence!
>>
>> Thanks for the help.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> /Lennart
>>
>>> 23 aug. 2018 kl. 15:09 skrev Johan Vos <johan at lodgon.com <mailto:johan at lodgon.com>>:
>>>
>>> The fact that you fallback to SW indicate ES2 failed to initialize indeed.
>>> I checked and merged your PR, and it runs locally fine for me on mac.
>>>
>>> As Kevin said, can you add javafx.verbose to true, as well as -Dprism.verbose=true ?
>>>
>>> Thanks for testing, these quirks are the ones we have to fix now :)
>>>
>>> - Johan
>>>
>>> Op do 23 aug. 2018 om 14:43 schreef Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>>:
>>>
>>> > at javafx.graphics/com.sun.prism.sw.SWPipeline.getDefaultResourceFactory(SWPipeline.java:82)
>>>
>>> This suggests that there may be some problems loading the native libs.
>>> Can you try running with '-Djavafx.verbose=true' ? Johan might have
>>> other suggestions.
>>>
>>> -- Kevin
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/23/2018 2:27 AM, Lennart Börjeson wrote:
>>> > After upgrading to the latest maven artefacts (11-ea+23) from the previous (11-ea+19), I get the following error when I try to run the javafx11sample hello3d from gradle:
>>> >
>>> >> Task :run
>>> > RenderJob.run: internal exception
>>> > java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 0
>>> > at java.base/java.util.Arrays$ArrayList.get(Arrays.java:4351)
>>> > at java.base/java.util.Collections$UnmodifiableList.get(Collections.java:1306)
>>> > at javafx.graphics/com.sun.glass.ui.Screen.getMainScreen(Screen.java:61)
>>> > at javafx.graphics/com.sun.prism.sw.SWPipeline.getDefaultResourceFactory(SWPipeline.java:82)
>>> > at javafx.graphics/com.sun.prism.GraphicsPipeline.getDefaultResourceFactory(GraphicsPipeline.java:120)
>>> > at javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.QuantumRenderer.lambda$createResourceFactory$2(QuantumRenderer.java:161)
>>> > at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
>>> > at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:305)
>>> > at javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.RenderJob.run(RenderJob.java:58)
>>> > at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
>>> > at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
>>> > at javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.QuantumRenderer$PipelineRunnable.run(QuantumRenderer.java:125)
>>> > at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:831)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > All context can be found at https://github.com/johanvos/javafx11samples/pull/1 <https://github.com/johanvos/javafx11samples/pull/1> <https://github.com/johanvos/javafx11samples/pull/1 <https://github.com/johanvos/javafx11samples/pull/1>> .
>>> >
>>> > The program runs fine when launched via maven or directly from the command line, so there must be some peculiarity concerning how gradle launches a program, but I can't figure out what.
>>> >
>>> > Note that I can run from gradle when I use the 11-ea+19 snapshots, so something must have changed in 11-ea+23 which causes this error.
>>> >
>>> > I'd really appreciate any help or insights with this. I get the same error when upgrading my real application, not just these samples, to 11-ea+23.
>>> >
>>> > This is on a Mac, BTW.
>>> >
>>>
>>
>
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list