Error while pushing changeset

[Kevin Rushforth]

Nir Lisker wrote:
>
>     If there isn't an existing JBS issue, then please file one
>
>
> I thought I would point to "8188314: Fix typos in FX API docs" even 
> though the exact changes I'm proposing are not listed there, but I can 
> submit a new bug just for those if it really matters (it will be 
> another Fix Typos issue).

We'll need a new JBS bug, since that one is already resolved with a 
changeset (every changeset needs a unique bug ID). Feel free to use the 
same synopsis if you like.


>  
>
>     I also note that with simple javadoc changes, this can be done
>     prior to your OCA being recorded if you like
>
>
> Yes, as a Participant. Iv'e signed the Sun CA some 7 years ago and 
> this week signed the OCA in case it didn't transfer over. It's not 
> crucial to handle it right now since the changes are trivial.

Good.

>
>     I haven't gotten to your email from yesterday
>
>
> It's a bit of a loaded one so it can wait after the RDP. I only needed 
> the minimum info to get these fixes before the RDP.

OK.

-- Kevin

> - Nir
>
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 9:43 PM, Kevin Rushforth 
> <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>     > I also note that tith simple javadoc changes...
>
>     "with" simple ...
>
>     -- Kevin
>
>
>
>     Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>
>
>
>         Nir Lisker wrote:
>
>             > This shows a lack of understanding about our processes
>
>             Yes it does, which is why I asked about it yesterday. I'll
>             send a webrev.
>
>
>         Ah, I haven't gotten to your email from yesterday, since I was
>         on vacation and am still catching up. If you can send a
>         webrev, and a pointer to a JBS issue, I'll attach it for you.
>         If there isn't an existing JBS issue, then please file one
>         (and I'll see that it gets moved into the JDK project
>         quickly). I also note that tith simple javadoc changes, this
>         can be done prior to your OCA being recorded if you like.
>
>         Thanks.
>
>         -- Kevin
>
>
>
>             Thanks,
>             Nir
>
>
>             On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 8:50 PM, Kevin Rushforth
>             <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
>             <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>
>             <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
>             <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>>> wrote:
>
>                 Why would you even try to push a changeset without
>             getting it
>                 reviewed first???
>
>                 This shows a lack of understanding about our processes and
>                 policies. Only committers have permission to push
>             changesets, and
>                 only after review. Please familiarize yourself with
>             the policies
>                 and procedures surrounding contributing to OpenJFX [1]
>             [2] [3] [4]
>                 [5]. Once you are familiar with these policies and
>             have signed the
>                 Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA) you can work with
>             someone to
>                 sponsor your change.
>
>                 -- Kevin
>
>                 [1] http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
>             <http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/>
>                 <http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
>             <http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/>>
>                 [2]
>             http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html
>             <http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html>
>                
>             <http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html
>             <http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html>>
>                 [3]
>                
>             https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report
>             <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report>
>                
>             <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report
>             <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Submitting+a+Bug+Report>>
>                 [4]
>             https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Reviews
>             <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Reviews>
>                
>             <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Reviews
>             <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Code+Reviews>>
>                 [5]
>                
>             https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Committing+the+Code
>             <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Committing+the+Code>
>                
>             <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Committing+the+Code
>             <https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Committing+the+Code>>
>
>
>
>                 Nir Lisker wrote:
>
>                     Iv'e created a small documentation fix and tried
>             to push it to
>                     http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt
>             <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt>
>                     <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt
>             <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/jfx-dev/rt>>. I got an
>             error:
>
>                     abort: push creates new remote head 2152a80ee902!
>                     hint: pull and merge or see 'hg help push' for
>             details about
>                     pushing new
>                     heads
>                     [command returned code 255 Tue Jan 09 19:40:10 2018]
>
>                     What can be the problem?
>                    
>
>