lipjpeg7 in static library

[Kevin Rushforth]

Hiding the symbols seems like a better solution than shipping two 
binaries, and is probably easier than mangling the symbols.

-- Kevin


Phil Race wrote:
> Does libjavafx_iio.a really need to export the JPEG symbols ?
> On Windows, or Linux, or Solaris ..  there are ways
> to limit the exported symbols from a library.
>
> I found this page for macos :
>
> https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/BPFrameworks/Tasks/ExportingInterfaces.html 
>
>
> Not a complete answer but maybe somewhere to start.
>
> -phil.
>
> On 01/24/2018 02:42 AM, Johan Vos wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are currently building a native library for javafx_iio which includes
>> libjpeg7. As a consequence, those symbols are included in the static
>> libjavafx_iio.a on iOS. If we add other libraries (e.g. OpenCV) this can
>> result in duplicate symbols, as the libjpeg7 library might be 
>> included in
>> other frameworks as well.
>>
>> As a dirty hack, I build 2 versions of libjavafx_iio.a: one with 
>> libjpeg7,
>> and one without. A better solution might be to prefix the symbols in the
>> libjpeg7 files.
>>
>> Or are there better ideas?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> - Johan
>