[11] Review request: 8203378: JDK build fails to compile javafx.graphics module-info.java if FX was built with OpenJDK

[Kevin Rushforth]

In that case, why don't I revert my changes and let you remove the 
references after j.u.l is removed.

-- Kevin


On 5/21/2018 2:13 PM, Nir Lisker wrote:
> Since the packager is being removed I don't see a reason to keep any 
> references to it. In any case, the Eclipse files are planned to be 
> updated [1] after j.u.l. is removed [2].
>
> [1] 
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-April/021740.html
>
> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8195974
>
> - Nir
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 8:54 PM, Kevin Rushforth 
> <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>     Phil or Ajit,
>
>     Please review the following simple fix:
>
>     https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8203378
>     <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8203378>
>     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8203378/webrev.00/
>     <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ekcr/8203378/webrev.00/>
>
>     This removes one qualified export from javafx.graphics to the
>     no-longer-built jdk.packager module. More details in JBS.
>
>     Note to Eclipse users: This patch modifies the Eclipse files to
>     remove references to jdk.packager. I would like a read from the
>     users of Eclipse as to whether I should do this or not. I am
>     equally happy to commit or revert my changes to these files.
>
>     -- Kevin
>
>