JavaFX 11.0.1-ea+1 release

[Kevin Rushforth]

As I said, all but the Marlin fix are confidential security bugs. And 
no, I can't comment on them. If you are interested, you can go to 
Mercurial and look at the changeset diffs. Or you can refer to my email 
of Oct 16 with the aggregate webrev [1] for the set of fixes that were 
integrated after the October CPU release.

-- Kevin

[1] 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2018-October/022702.html


On 11/2/2018 8:22 AM, Nir Lisker wrote:
> What is 8204880: Enhance object method calls? It's unviewable.
>
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 3:20 PM Laurent Bourgès 
> <bourges.laurent at gmail.com <mailto:bourges.laurent at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     That is important to me to share publicly release notes.
>
>     Cheers,
>     Laurent
>
>     Le ven. 2 nov. 2018 à 14:12, Kevin Rushforth
>     <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com <mailto:kevin.rushforth at oracle.com>> a
>     écrit :
>
>     > The JBS query would only show up the one Marlin fix, because the
>     rest
>     > were confidential security bugs. Here is the list, as seen in
>     the 'hg log'
>     >
>     > 8194321: Update FX installer
>     > 8195879: Improve media support
>     > 8204365: Improve WebView processing
>     > 8204880: Enhance object method calls
>     > 8207387: WebView is not rendering html checkbox and radio buttons
>     > 8210386: Clipping problems with complex affine transforms: negative
>     > scaling factors or small scaling factors
>     >
>     > -- Kevin
>     >
>     >
>     > On 11/2/2018 3:52 AM, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
>     > > Hi,
>     > >
>     > > Could you publish the list of included bug fixed (JBS query) ?
>     > >
>     > > Cheers,
>     > > Laurent
>     > >
>     > > Le ven. 2 nov. 2018 à 10:00, Johan Vos <johan.vos at gluonhq.com
>     <mailto:johan.vos at gluonhq.com>> a écrit :
>     > >
>     > >> Hi,
>     > >>
>     > >> We are about to release JavaFX 11.0.1, containing the fixes
>     that made it
>     > >> into the 11-dev repository.
>     > >> An early-access build for this is available as SDK/jmods at
>     > >>
>     > >>
>     >
>     http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_linux-x64_bin-jmods.zip
>     > >>
>     > >>
>     >
>     http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_linux-x64_bin-sdk.zip
>     > >>
>     > >>
>     >
>     http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_osx-x64_bin-jmods.zip
>     > >>
>     > >>
>     >
>     http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_osx-x64_bin-sdk.zip
>     > >> <
>     > >>
>     >
>     http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_linux-x64_bin-sdk.zip
>     > >>
>     >
>     http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_windows-x64_bin-jmods.zip
>     > >>
>     > >>
>     >
>     http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_windows-x64_bin-sdk.zip
>     > >>
>     > >> The maven artifacts are available in the usual repositories, with
>     > version
>     > >> tag being "11.0.1-ea+1" e.g.
>     > >>
>     > >> org.openjfx:javafx-base:11.0.1-ea+1 (see
>     > >>
>     >
>     http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/openjfx/javafx-base/11.0.1-ea+1/)
>     > >>
>     > >> If we don't hear major issues with this ea, it should become
>     the 11.0.1
>     > >> release.
>     > >>
>     > >> - Johan
>     > >>
>     >
>     >
>