JavaFX 11.0.1-ea+1 release

[Michael Paus]

My application is reporting the following values for the respective 
properties:

java.runtime.version: 11.0.1+13
java.class.version: 55.0
java.version: 11.0.1
javafx.version: 11

Shouldn't "javafx.version" follow the same naming conventions as used by 
"java.version"?


Am 02.11.18 um 09:59 schrieb Johan Vos:
> Hi,
>
> We are about to release JavaFX 11.0.1, containing the fixes that made it
> into the 11-dev repository.
> An early-access build for this is available as SDK/jmods at
> http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_linux-x64_bin-jmods.zip
> http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_linux-x64_bin-sdk.zip
> http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_osx-x64_bin-jmods.zip
> http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_osx-x64_bin-sdk.zip
> <http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_linux-x64_bin-sdk.zip>
> http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_windows-x64_bin-jmods.zip
> http://download2.gluonhq.com/openjfx/11.0.1/openjfx-11.0.1-ea+1_windows-x64_bin-sdk.zip
>
> The maven artifacts are available in the usual repositories, with version
> tag being "11.0.1-ea+1" e.g.
>
> org.openjfx:javafx-base:11.0.1-ea+1 (see
> http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/openjfx/javafx-base/11.0.1-ea+1/)
>
> If we don't hear major issues with this ea, it should become the 11.0.1
> release.
>
> - Johan