RFR: 8225571: Port DND source to use GTK instead of GDK

[Kevin Rushforth]

On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 20:02:22 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <kcr at openjdk.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 19:54:50 GMT, Thiago Milczarek Sayao <tsayao at openjdk.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 19:54:50 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <kcr at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 19:54:48 GMT, Thiago Milczarek Sayao <tsayao at openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225571
>>>> 
>>>> To run tests (on the root of the source tree):
>>>> ./gradlew apps
>>>> java @build/run.args -cp apps/toys/DragDrop/dist/DragDrop.jar dragdrop.DragDropWithControls
>>>> java @build/run.args -cp apps/toys/DragDrop/dist/DragDrop.jar dragdrop.DragDropColor
>>>> 
>>>> java -Djdk.gtk.version=2 @build/run.args -cp apps/toys/DragDrop/dist/DragDrop.jar dragdrop.DragDropWithControls
>>>> java -Djdk.gtk.version=2 @build/run.args -cp apps/toys/DragDrop/dist/DragDrop.jar dragdrop.DragDropColor
>>>> 
>>>> ----------------
>>>> 
>>>> Commits:
>>>>  - 3d650b2b: Gtk DND port for Linux
>>>> 
>>>> Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/4/files
>>>>  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/jfx/4/webrev.00
>>>>   Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225571
>>>>   Stats: 669 lines in 5 files changed: 81 ins; 442 del; 146 mod
>>>>   Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/4.diff
>>>>   Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx pull/4/head:pull/4
>>> 
>>> @tsayao In your case `/covered` isn't what's needed. You have an OpenJDK ID so should do this instead:
>>> 
>>>> If you already are an OpenJDK [Author](https://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#author), [Committer](https://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#committer) or [Reviewer](https://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#reviewer), please click [here](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/secure/CreateIssue.jspa?pid=11300&issuetype=1) to open a new issue so that we can record that fact. Please use "Add GitHub user tsayao" as summary for the issue.
>> 
>> Yes, noticed that while reading the comment again. I have opened an issue. Thanks.
> 
> @pankaj-bansal can you review this as well?

Preliminary review was here: [javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/490](https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/490)

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/4