RFR: 8207957: TableSkinUtils should not contain actual code implementation

[Hadzic Samir]

On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 10:22:11 GMT, Jeanette Winzenburg <fastegal at openjdk.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 06:13:48 GMT, Hadzic Samir <shadzic at openjdk.org> wrote:
> 
>> Allright, this is a fix for JDK-8207957
>> 
>> ----------------
>> 
>> Commits:
>>  - 969ebb51: Fixing TableColumnHeaderTest
>>  - 9d379619: Removing Tablecolumnbasehelper
>>  - 4fe020fc: Fix javadoc for TableColumnHeader
>>  - c422c80f: Minor modification and uni test added.
>>  - b2bdfb5b: Change resizeColumn to protected without static in order to be able to override
>>  - 3b9b7903: Second option for resizeColumnToFitContent in TableColumnHeader
>>  - d91c56e5: First attempt to extract resizeColumnToFitContent
>> 
>> Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/6/files
>>  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/jfx/6/webrev.00
>>   Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8207957
>>   Stats: 523 lines in 4 files changed: 330 ins; 187 del; 6 mod
>>   Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/6.diff
>>   Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx pull/6/head:pull/6
> 
> modules/javafx.controls/src/main/java/javafx/scene/control/skin/TableColumnHeader.java line 600:
> 
>> 599:      * expensive if the number of rows is large. Subclass can either call this method or override it (no need to call
>> 600:      * {@code super()}) to provide their custom algorithm.
>> 601:      *
> 
> see https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/pull/289#discussion_r245482213 - I think I made a suggestion (that probably needs some native speaker's fine tuning :)

Allright @kleopatra , I have indeed removed the TableColumn argument. It is clearer now that we are resizing the TableColumn of the header.

I have updated the description a bit but really I'm really not good at method description so I'm open to all suggestions..

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/6