RFR: 8232524: SynchronizedObservableMap cannot be be protected for copying/iterating
Robert Lichtenberger
rlichten at openjdk.org
Mon Oct 21 10:19:04 UTC 2019
By using the collection itself as synchronization lock we achieve behaviour that matches java.util.Collections classes.
I've create test cases that fail with the current way of synchronizing on a separate object.
I've removed unused constructors.
----------------
Commits:
- 7e80839f: 8232524: SynchronizedObservableMap cannot be be protected for copying/iterating
- 8ecf3545: JDK-8232524 fixed.
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/17/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/jfx/17/webrev.00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8232524
Stats: 120 lines in 2 files changed: 95 ins; 17 del; 8 mod
Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/17.diff
Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx pull/17/head:pull/17
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jfx/pull/17
More information about the openjfx-dev
mailing list